Tag:

Institute1April

Cyberattacks undermine trust: Institute 1 April editorial cover exploring digital identity protection, resilience and QEI.

A cyberattack can interrupt essential services within moments. But the lasting harm is not confined to downtime. What happens when attackers also compromise a person’s digital identity, an administrator’s permissions or the power to approve sensitive actions? Could a different identity architecture limit the damage?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Illustrative cover about searches for missing children, cross-border cooperation and privacy-preserving alerts in the QEI research concept.

When a child goes missing, even a few minutes can make a difference. How do police, specialist organisations and public alert systems in Slovenia, Europe and the United States respond? And could the QEI research concept support faster, trustworthy information-sharing without turning child protection into permanent surveillance?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Most common online scams – phishing, fake shops, bank fraud and QEI digital identity protection

From fake online shops, investment fraud and stolen bank details to synthetic voices and AI-assisted impersonation, online scams are becoming increasingly convincing. Could digital identity be designed so that stealing a password, forging a message or manipulating a user would no longer be enough to carry out an unauthorised action?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Digital identity without internet – QEI offline verification

The internet can fail. Mobile networks can disappear. A central service can become temporarily unavailable. But a person does not stop being who they are. Should their digital identity stop working as well? QEI explores a different approach: the internet as infrastructure for issuance and synchronisation, but not necessarily as a requirement for every individual proof.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Fraudsters targeting Italy’s Fideuram reportedly used deceptive communications and artificial intelligence to imitate the voice of a trusted person. The result: transfers totalling about €95 million. The case exposes a growing problem: if a person’s voice, image and communication style can be convincingly imitated, what should proof of digital identity and authority rely on in the future?

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer posts